Therefore, according to the Court, the First Amendment did not apply. Supreme Court ruled that the government was really the one speaking in these ads. Dairy farmers Joseph and Brenda Cochran challenged the program and won an early legal victory.īut in a 2005 case brought by small cattlemen against the “Beef: It’s What’s for Dinner” campaign, the U.S. So, at first, some of the small farmers won. The First Amendment protects your right not to say things with which you disagree, and this includes paying for them. Not surprisingly, these unpopular programs have resulted in legal challenges. These federal programs exist for everything from eggs to mushrooms to cotton, and the approach is always the same: The federal government forces small farmers to pay for ads they hate promoting the giant factory farms’ message that the product is the same regardless of who provides it. And this problem splatters far beyond milk.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |